Non-National Highway System pavement projects
MnDOT District 4
Learn more about how MnDOT evaluates and selects pavement projects
MnDOT scores stretches of highway based on a pavement need when selecting projects to include in the 10-year Capital Highway Investment Plan. Pavement needs on the National Highway System (NHS) are scored and selected separately from pavement needs off the system. MnDOT’s approach to managing pavements follows the guidance and targets in the Transportation Asset Management Plan and the planned outcomes in MnSHIP.
Pavement projects are scored and selected within each district. Potential pavement projects are identified by the Highway Pavement Management Application (HPMA) and by MnDOT District staff.
Once selected, MnDOT then identifies and evaluates alternatives and other needs, legal requirements, issues and opportunities in coordination with local partners, and considers public input. In the process, non-pavement work may be added to a pavement project or a pavement project may be combined with a nearby bridge project. The department follows a context-sensitive complete streets approach, which considers the needs of all users. The final project may address a substantial number of needs beyond the pavement need that precipitated the project. Projects may move years based on local coordination, project delivery, timing of other nearby construction projects, and funding shifts.
What was selected
Related links
- District 4 project selection
- District 4 National Highway System pavement projects
- District 4 Urban pavement projects
How the projects scored
The construction costs shown on this list represent a very rough estimate based on limited information available at the time selection decisions were made. Actual construction and delivery costs will change over time as projects go from a concept through the project development process and are eventually constructed.
Last updated December 2024
| Score | Route | Description | High Level Cost Estimate for Planning Purposes | Year Planned (FY) | Comments |
| 81 | Hwy 108 | Resurface highway 108 from county road 41 to highway 78 | $6,898,499 | 2031 | 5623-40 |
| 93 | Hwy 27 | Medium mill and overlay from 3rd St to I-94 | $9,300,000 | Not Selected | District disagrees with RQI predictions |
| 83 | Hwy 114 | Resurface highway 114 from highway 55 to interstate 94 | $3,499,995 | 2027 | 2110-11 |
| 82 | Hwy 28 | Resurface from state line to highway 7 | $3,797,023 | 2032 | 0604-24 Not a district priority, will continue to monitor pavement performance |
| 81 | Hwy 108 | From east of Pelican Rapids to Hwy 78 | $6,315,744 | 2030 | 5623-38 |
| 80 | Hwy 32 | Thin mill and overlay from US10 to Clay/Norman County Line | $6,400,000 | Not Selected | District disagrees with RQI predictions |
| 80 | Hwy 9 | Medium mill and overlay from Chippewa River bridge to Stevens County Road 22 | $12,000,000 | Not Selected | Disagree with RQI trends, will continue to monitor pavement condition |
| 79 | Hwy 113 | Hwy 113 from county road 4 to highway 71 | $12,230,205 | 2032 | 0307-100 |
| 79 | Hwy 27 | Medium mill and overlay from Grant County road 11 to Hwy 55 | $8,400,000 | Not Selected | District disagrees with RQI predictions |
| 79 | US75 | Thin mill and overlay from 2nd Ave to Clay/Norman County Line | $6,500,000 | Not Selected | District disagrees with RQI predictions |
| 78 | Hwy 108 | Resurface from the south jct of Hwy 78 to 4th Street in Henning. | $5,418,079 | 2029 | 5624-19 |
| 78 | Hwy 210 | Resurface from Hwy 29 to west of Hwy 71 | $4,605,924 | 2026 | 5604-09 |
| 77 | Hwy 78 | Thin mill and overlay from I-94 to Hwy 210 | $7,100,000 | Not Selected | District disagrees with RQI predictions |
| 77 | Hwy 9 | Resurface from Hwy 210 to 6th Street in Barnesville | $10,621,308 | 2029 | 8409-26 |
| 76 | Hwy 7 | Resurface and improve drainage on Hwy 7 near Ortonville | $6,225,000 | 2030 | 0609-33 |
| 76 | Hwy 9 | Thin mill and overlay from US10 to Clay/Norman County Line | $6,400,000 | Not Selected | District disagrees with RQI predictions |
| 76 | US75 | Thin mill and overlay from 46th Ave S to 30th Ave | $900,000 | Not Selected | District disagrees with RQI predictions |
| 75 | Hwy 34 | Medium mill and overlay from Hwy 9 to US59 | $9,700,000 | Not Selected | District disagrees with RQI predictions |
| 75 | US75 | Medium mill and overlay from Hwy 210 to 220th St | $6,800,000 | Not Selected | District disagrees with RQI predictions |
| 74 | Hwy 27 | Resurface from hwy 28 to county road 6 | $6,798,945 | 2029 | 7802-37 |
| 74 | US75 | Resurface from Mustinka River Bridge to railroad crossing north of highway 55 | $6,500,002 | 2027 | 7806-32 |
| 73 | Hwy 113 | Resurface from highway 59 to county highway 4 | $5,646,138 | 2034 | 4405-35 District disagrees with RQI predictions |
| 73 | US75 | Hwy 75 from Hwy 12 to Hwy 28 in Graceville | $7,846,171 | 2030 | 0608-40 |
| 73 | US75 | Medium mill and overlay from Hwy 55 to Hwy 28 | $4,900,000 | Not Selected | NA |
| 73 | US75 | Medium mill and overlay from Hwy 9 to Beede Ave | $3,800,000 | Not Selected | District disagrees with RQI predictions |
| 72 | Hwy 78 | Resurface on 78, from Wagon Trail to county road 54 | $8,167,053 | 2031 | 5620-26 |
| 71 | Hwy 114 | Medium mill and overlay from 8th St to Hwy 55 | $2,400,000 | Not Selected | Small Segment Of Larger Project |
| 70 | Hwy 27 | Medium mill and overlay from Hwy 75 to Grant County Road 7 | $7,300,000 | Not Selected | Small Segment Of Larger Project |
| 70 | Hwy 55 | Medium mill and overlay from Church St to US59 | $2,500,000 | Not Selected | NA |
| 70 | Hwy 7 | Medium mill and overlay from 1.57 miles south of Big Stone County Road 68 to Pacific Ave | $5,500,000 | Not Selected | NA |
| 68 | Hwy 7 | Medium mill and overlay from Big Stone County Road 68 to Pacific Ave | $700,000 | Not Selected | NA |
| 68 | US75 | RESURFACE US 75, FROM 0.1 MILES NORTH OF CSAH12 TO 1.3 MILES NORTH OF CSAH 12 | $1,620,134 | 2026 | 1406-79 |
| 67 | Hwy 29 | Medium mill and overlay from Hwy 40 to Chippewa/Swift County Line | $1,600,000 | Not Selected | NA |
| 67 | Hwy 9 | Medium mill and overlay from Hwy 55 to Hwy 75 | $6,600,000 | Not Selected | NA |
| 66 | Hwy 117 | Resurface from sd Border to Highway 27 | $831,161 | 2033 | 7807-11 |
| 66 | Hwy 87 | Medium mill and overlay from Becker/Wadena County Line to US71 | $1,700,000 | Not Selected | NA |
| 65 | Hwy 114 | Resurface Hwy 114 from Starbuck to Lowry; includes reconstruction and ADA in Lowry | $5,080,084 | 2025 | 6111-26 |
| 64 | US75 | Medium mill and overlay from Hwy 28 to Traverse County Road 11 | $3,900,000 | Not Selected | NA |
| 61 | Hwy 329 | Medium mill and overlay from US59 to eastern boundary of U of M experiment station | $600,000 | Not Selected | NA |
| 61 | US75 | Medium mill and overlay within the Clay County Road 12 roundabout | $200,000 | Not Selected | NA |
| 60 | Hwy 29 | Resurface highway 29 from highway 210 to highway 71 | $9,685,326 | 2033 | 5610-15 |
| 52 | US75 | Resurface from Breckenridge to Doran | $7,378,567 | 2033 | 8406-24 |
| 52 | US75 | Resurface highway 75 from Doran to north of highway 55 | $10,697,188 | 2034 | 8406-25 |
| 44 | Hwy 7 | Resurface from highway 28/Beardsley to county road 9 | $3,810,123 | 2031 | 0609-34 |
| 78 | US59 | Resurface from Swift/Stevens county line to highway 12 | $4,136,391 | Not Selected | 7609-11 |